SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(SC) 399

RUMA PAL, DALVEER BHANDARI
TARAI FOOD LTD. – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MEERUT-II, UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


ORDER

1. The question in these appeals is whether "french fries" should be classified under Sub-

Heading 2001.10 or 2001.90 of Chapter 20 of the a Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The two entries read as follows:

"Heading Sub- Heading Description of goods Rate of duty

No. No.

(1) (2) (3) (4)

20.0.1 Preparations of vegetables,

fruit, nuts or other parts of

plants, including jams, fruit

jellies, marmalades, fruit or

nut puree and fruit or nut

pastes, fruit juices and

vegetable juices, whether

or not containing added

sugar or other sweetening

matter

2001.10 -Put up in unit containers

and bearing a brand name 8%

2001.90 -Others Nil" 2.

The appellant manufactures "french fries" and sells the same sometimes under the brand name "Inland Valley" and sometimes without any such name. Those packets of "french fries" which bear the name of "Inland Valley" are cleared by the appellant under TSH 2001.10 and the relevant excise duty is paid thereon. Those packets which do not contain the name d "Inland Valley" are cleared under TSH 2001.90 and no excise duty is paid.

3. The Department was of the view that the second lot of goods should also have been cleared by the appellant










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top