S.B.SINHA, CYRIAC JOSEPH
State of Uttaranchal – Appellant
Versus
Alok Sharma – Respondent
JUDGMENT
S.B. Sinha, J.—
1. Leave granted.
2. Interpretation and/ or application of various circular letters issued by the State of Uttar Pradesh which have been adopted by the State of Uttarakhand after it was formed in terms of the U.P. State Reorganisation Act is in question in these appeals.
3. Two government companies being M/s. Teletronix Ltd. and Kumaon Television Ltd. were the subsidiary companies of Kumaon Mandal Vikas Nigam Ltd. The employees of the said government companies were retrenched. The State of Uttar Pradesh took a policy decision to appoint the employees of the said government companies. For the said purpose, it framed rules purported to be in exercise of its power under the proviso appended to Article 309 of the Constitution of India, known as the Uttar Pradesh Absorption of Retrenched Employees of Government of Public Corporations in Government Services Rules, 1991 (for short “the Rules”).
4. The term “retrenched employee” is defined in Rule 2(c) of the Rules as under:
“(c) “retrenched employee” means a person who was appointed on a post under the Government or a public corporation on or before October 1, 1986 in accordance with the procedure laid down for re
Secretary, State of Karnataka v. Umadevi (3)
Post Master General, Kolkata v. Tutu Das (Dutta)
Official Liquidator v. Dayanand
Punjab State Warehousing Corpn., Chandigarh v. Manmohan Singh
Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan v. Sajal Kumar Roy
State of Karnataka v. R.Vivekananda Swamy
Punjab State Electricity Board v. Gurmail Singh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.