SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(SC) 524

2009(4) Supreme 556
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
(From Bombay High Court)
Tarun Chatterjee and H.L. Dattu, JJ.
Mehul Mahendra Thakkar @ Karia — Appellant
versus
Meena Mehul Thakkar @ Karia — Respondent
Civil Appeal No.1788 of 2009
(Arising out of SLP(C) No. 22196 of 2007)
Decided on : 23-03-2009

Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant :Rishi Kesh, Rajiv Dewan, Advocates.
For the Respondent:Vinay Navare, Ms. Abha R. Sharma, Advocates.

IMPORTANT POINT
Granting final relief by way of interim relief before the matter is decided one way or the other is impermissible in law.

Headnote:Judicial Review – Final relief should not be granted by way of interim relief till the matter is decided one way or the other. (Para 5)

       Facts of the case :

        1. The High Court directed the Court Receiver to take possession of the flat from the appellant and induct respondent-wife in the flat during the pendency of the appeal.

        2. Even before giving a verdict on the findings and the conclusions reached by the Family Court, by way of interim relief, the court has granted the main relief itself.

       Finding of the Court :

        Granting final relief before decision on the matter is impermissible in law.

       Result : Appeal allowed.

       

ORDER

1. Leave granted.

2. The order passed by the High Court of Bombay in Civil Application No. 238 of 2007 filed in Family Court Appeal No. 128 of 2007 dated 5.10.2007 is the subject matter of this appeal.

3. By the impugned order, the court has directed the Court Receiver to take possession of the flat from the appellant and induct respondent-wife in the flat during the pendency of the appeal.

4. In the appeal filed, the appellant has called in question the correctness or otherwise of the findings and the conclusion reached by the Family Court in Petition No. A-1072/2000 dated 6.2.2007, wherein the Family Court has reached the conclusion that both the husband and wife are joint owners of flat bearing No. 303, Rajesh Nagar Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., Borivali (West), Mumbai.

5. Even before giving a verdict on the findings and the conclusions reached by the Family Court, by way of interim relief, the court has granted the main relief itself. This, in our opinion is unsustainable. It is settled legal position, that by way of interim relief, final relief should not be granted till the matter is decided one way or the other.

6. In view of the above, we allow this appeal and set aside the order by the High Court in Family Court Appeal No. 128 of 2007 dated 5th day of October, 2007. In view of the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case, we request the court to dispose of the appeal as early as possible and at any rate within an outer limit of six months from the date of receipt of copy of this court’s order.

***********

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top