SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(SC) 1700

ARIJIT PASAYAT, MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA
Kamla Chaturvedi – Appellant
Versus
National Insurance Co. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

DR. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Madhya Pradesh High Court, Jabalpur Bench, allowing the Misc. Appeal filed by the respondent No.1 (hereinafter referred to as the `Insurance Company'). The controversy lies within a very narrow compass.

3. Challenge in the Misc. Appeal before the High Court was to the Award made by the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation, Labour Court No.1 Gwalior (in short the `Commissioner'). A sum of Rs.2,21,370/- along with interest at the rate of 12% per annum was awarded. The liability to make the payment was fixed on the Insurance company. In appeal the only ground raised was that in a claim arising under the Workmen's Compansation Act, 1923 (in short the `Act') interest is not payable by the Insurance company as there was no contract by the insurer with the insured with regard to the payment of interest. High Court accepted the stand placing reliance on a judgment of this Court in New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Harshadbhai Amrutbhai Modhiya [2006(5) SCC 192]. It was held that the direction for payment of interest by the insurance company was not sustainable and












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top