SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(SC) 232

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Lokeshwar Singh Panta, Aftab Alam, JJ
Indra Pal Singh - Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. -Respondent
WITH
Jagat Singh - Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. - Respondent
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1247 OF 2006
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 90 OF 2007
Decided on : 2-12-2008

Headnote:

Indian Penal Code,1860 - Section 148, 149, 302, 148 - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 313 – Dacoity - Imprisonment for life - Rigorous imprisonment– Offence of Murder – Appeal has got three sons lodged F.I.R at a.m. at Police Station situated at a distance of about from village alleging therein that in year was committed at the house of his co-villager who doubted that offence was committed at instance of his son Ram Karan Singh and on that account had entertained grudge against him and his family members - One resident of village was also involved in the said dacoity case and P.W. 1 appeared as a defence witness for accused and for that reason also sons of used to threaten him with dire consequences - He alleged that on July his son had gone to market at and in evening went to Yamuna South Bank railway station to receive his son who was to bring some essential articles from market - At about reached at Yamuna South Bank station along with and many other persons got down from train - He took gunny bag containing seers of from who was carrying one more bag containing of sugar – Held, Testimony has been found to be satisfactory, consistent and credible by High Court - Both the witnesses have been subjected to searching cross-examination by defence but nothing tangible material has been extracted from their evidence to create any shadow of doubt to disbelieve and discard their truthful testimony - It is well-settled that if eye witness is related to the deceased his evidence has to be accepted if found to be reliable and believable because he would honestly be interested in ensuring that real culprits are punished - Court do find any merit in any of the submissions of the appellants therefore confirm convictions - On our examination of judgment of the High Court find that High Court has subjected prosecution evidence to critical scrutiny and has reached the conclusion that so far appellants herein are concerned charges under Sections 302 read with Section 149 Indian Penal Code and Section 148 Indian Penal Code are fully established against them – Court are therefore satisfied that prosecution has successfully proved its case against appellants – Appeal Dismissed

JUDGMENT

Lokeshwar Singh Panta, J.

1. Both these appeals arising out of the common judgment and order dated 09.12.2005 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Government Appeal No. 2004 of 1981, were heard together and shall stand disposed of by this common order. By the impugned order, the High Court while setting aside the judgment of acquittal dated June 5, 1981 recorded by the Additional Sessions Judge, Hamirpur, in Sessions Trial No. 293 of 1980, convicted the accused under Section 302 read with Section 149 and Section 148 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced them to imprisonment for life and two years' rigorous imprisonment respectively.

2. Brief facts of the case are that Subedar Singh (P.W. 1) has got three sons, namely, Jai Karan Singh, Shiv Karan Singh and Ram Karan Singh. P.W. 1 lodged F.I.R. (Ex. Ka.1) on 24.07.1980 at 6:15 a.m. at Police Station, Sumerpur situated at a distance of about 15 kms. from village Patyora, alleging therein that in the year 1976 dacoity was committed at the house of his co-villager Lalloo Singh, who doubted that the offence was committed at the instance of his son Ram Karan Singh and on that account Lalloo Singh had entertained grudge against him and his family members. One Raja bhiah, resident of village Surauli was also involved in the said dacoity case and P.W. 1 appeared as a defence witness for accused Raja bhiah and for that reason also, sons of Lalloo Singh used to threaten him with dire consequences. He alleged that on 23rd July, 1980 his son Jai Karan Singh had gone to the market at Sumerpur and in the evening P.W. 1 went to Yamuna South Bank railway station to receive his son, who was to bring some essential articles from the market. At about 7:30 p.m., the train reached at Yamuna South Bank station. Jai Karan Singh along with Shiv Nath Kewat, Dayalu (P.W. 4) and many other persons got down from the train. He took gunny bag containing 15 seers of `khalli' from Jai Karan Singh who was carrying one more bag containing 3-4 kgs. Of sugar. All of them proceeded towards the village. At about 8:30 p.m., they took a turn from Link Road for the pathway going to the village and Jai Karan Singh was going a few paces ahead of them. Ayodhya Singh son of Lalloo Singh and Indra Pal Singh son of Prithvi Singh armed with DBBL guns and Ranvijay Singh son of Lalloo Singh along with one Jagat Singh son of Rajwa Singh armed with SBBL guns and Ram Bahadur Singh son of Lalloo Singh who was carrying lathi and torch were waiting for the arrival of his son Jai Karan Singh by the side of the pathway. Ayodhya Singh fired gunshot at Jai Karan Singh and immediately thereafter Ranvijay Singh, Jagat Pal Singh and Indra Pal Singh indiscriminately fired rounds at Jai Karan Singh with their respective guns. Jai Karan Singh, on receiving fire arm injuries, fell down near the water channel and ridge of the field of one Brinda Singh towards east side of the path way. The witnesses present at the spot flashed torches at the faces of the accused and recognized them in torch light. The accused, after committing the crime, fled away from the scene of occurrence.

3. P.W. 1 with the help of his co-villagers took the body of deceased Jai Karan Singh to his house at village Patyora. He got FIR scribed from his son Shiv Karan Singh (P.W. 5) at 3:00 a.m. on the following day of the incident and thereafter went to the Police Station, Sumerpur. He handed over the report to the H.M. Rajendra Veer Singh (P.W. 6) who prepared Check Report on the basis of which FIR (Ex. Ka.1) came to be registered. Sub-Inspector Asha Ram Tripathi (P.W. 7) took up investigation of the crime in his hand and rushed to the place where the dead body of Jai Karan Singh was laid. He drew inquest proceedings on the dead body and prepared an Inquest Report (Ex.Ka.5) and other necessary papers (Ex. Ka.6 & Ka. 7) and then handed over the dead body in a sealed cover (Ex.Ka.9) along with other necessary papers to Constables Ra
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top