SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(SC) 1800

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
S. H. KAPADIA AND AFTAB ALAM, JJ.
Chembra Orchard Produce Ltd. & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
Regional Director of Company Affairs & Anr. - Respondents
CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 7115-7120 OF 2008
(Arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 25511-25516 of 2007)
Decided on : December 4, 2008

Headnote:

Companies Act, 1956 - Section 391 (1) - Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 67 - Summons returnable - Seeking directions to convene a meeting of creditors and members to consider a scheme of amalgamation is required to be heard and decided ex-parte as per - Civil Appeals is whether an application filed by Company Summons for directions to convene a meeting - An application under section 391(1) for an order convening a meeting of creditors and/ or members or any class of them shall be by a Judges summons supported by an affidavit - A copy of the proposed compromise or arrangement shall be annexed to affidavit as an exhibit thereto - Save as provided in rule 68 summons shall be moved ex parte - Held, In impugned judgment reliance is placed on the earlier judgment of High Court in the case of Hind Auto Indo Ltd. v. M/s Premier Motors (P) Ltd reported in AIR - From a bare reading of that judgment court find that said case related to interpretation of Section 394A of Companies Act with which we are not concerned in this case - Be that as it may there are observations in the said judgment, with respect with which we do not agree both on the interpretation of Rule 67 and 69 on one hand as also on basis of practical effect of interpretation given by High Court in present case - If at threshold stage of directions to convene a meeting hearing is required to be given to the members as held in impugned judgment scheme of Companies (Court) Rules 1959 will become unworkable - Civil Appeal Allowed

ORDER

Leave granted.

The short question which arises for determination in these Civil Appeals is whether an application filed by the Company under Section 391 (1) of the Companies Act, 1956 (for short the `1956 Act') seeking directions to convene a meeting of creditors and members to consider a scheme of amalgamation is required to be heard and decided ex-parte as per Rule 67 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959?

To answer the above question we need to quote hereinbelow the relevant Rules.

"Rule 2(9) `Judge's summons' means a summons returnable before the Judge in Chambers or in Court.

67. Summons for directions to convene a meeting.- An application under section 391(1) for an order convening a meeting of creditors and/ or members or any class of them shall be by a Judge's summons supported by an affidavit. A copy of the proposed compromise or arrangement shall be annexed to the affidavit as an exhibit thereto. Save as provided in rule 68 hereunder, the summons shall be moved ex parte. The summons shall be in Form No. 33, and the affidavit in support thereof in Form No. 34.

68. Service on company- Where the company is not the applicant, a copy of the summons and of the affidavit shall be served on the company, or, where the company is being wound- up, on its liquidator, not less than 14 days before the date fixed for the hearing of the summons.

69. Directions at hearing of summons.- Upon the hearing of the summons or any adjourned hearing thereof, the Judge shall, unless he thinks fit for any reason to dismiss the summons, give such directions as he may think necessary in respect of the following matters: --

(1) determining the class or classes of creditors and/or of members whose meeting or meetings have to be held for considering the proposed compromise or arrangement;

(2) fixing the time and place of such meeting or meetings;

(3) appointing a chairman or chairmen for the meeting or meetings to be held, as the case may be;

(4) fixing the quorum and the procedure to be followed at the meeting or meetings, including voting by proxy;

(5) determining the values of the creditors and/or the members, or the creditors or members of any class, as the case may be, whose meetings have to be held;

(6) notice to be given of the meeting or meetings and the advertisement of such notice;

(7) the time within which the Chairman of the meeting is to report to the Court the result of the meeting; and such other matters as the Court may deem necessary.

The order made on the summons shall be in Form No. 35 with such variations as may be necessary."

...

73. Notice of meeting.- The notice of the meeting to be given to the creditors and/or members, or to the creditors or members of any class, as the case may be, shall be in Form No. 36, and shall be sent to them individually by the Chairman appointed for the meeting, or, if the Court so directs, by the company (or its Liquidator), or any other person as the Court may direct, by post under certificate of posting to their last known address not less than 21 clear days before the date fixed for the meeting. It shall be accompanied by a copy of the proposed compromise or arrangement and of the statement required to be furnished under section 393, and a form of proxy in Form No. 37.

74. Advertisement of the notice of meeting.- The notice of the meeting shall be advertised in such newspapers and in such manner as the Judge may direct, not less than 21 clear days before the date fixed for the meeting. The advertisement shall be in Form No. 38.

75. Copy of compromise or arrangement to be furnished by the company.- Every creditor or member entitled to attend the meeting shall be furnished by the company, free of charge and within 24 hours of a requisition being made for the same, with a copy of the proposed compromise or arrangement together with a copy of the statement required to be furnished under section 393, unless the same had been already furnished to such member or creditor.

76. Affidavit of service.- The Chairman ap
































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top