SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(SC) 1706

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT and Dr. MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA, JJ.
Vithal Pundalik Zendge –Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1026 OF 2007
Decided on : November 19, 2008

Headnote:

Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 134 - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 294 – Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 302 read with Section 149 – Appeal against Conviction - Appeal is to judgment of a Division Bench of Bombay High Court dismissing three appeals preferred by the present appellant and two other co-accused - Criminal Appeal was filed by present appellant while co-accused filed Criminal Appeal filed Criminal Appeal accused persons faced trial for alleged commission of offences punishable under Sections 144, 148, 302 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Appellant faced trial along with others - Appellant was first accused - Trial Court held that all the accused persons were guilty and they were awarded life sentence in respect of offence punishable - Held, This Court held that as a general rule the court can and may act on testimony of a single witness provided he is wholly reliable - There is no legal impediment in convicting a person on sole testimony of a single witness - That is logic of Section 134 of Indian Evidence Act 1872 - But if there are doubts about the testimony the courts will insist on corroboration - It is for court to act upon testimony of witnesses - It is not number quantity but quality that is material - Time-honored principle is that evidence has to be weighed and not counted - On this principle stands edifice of Section 134 of Evidence Act - Test is whether evidence has a ring of truth is cogent credible and trustworthy or otherwise - Appeal Dismissed.

JUDGMENT

1. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court dismissing the three appeals preferred by the present appellant and two other co-accused. Criminal Appeal No.703 of 2000 was filed by the present appellant while the co-accused Kisan filed Criminal Appeal No. 701 of 2000 and Milind Dhondu Gaikawad filed Criminal Appeal 702 of 2000. The accused persons faced trial for alleged commission of offences punishable under Sections 144, 148, 302 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC'). The appellant faced trial alongwith 8 others. Appellant was first accused (A-1). The trial Court held that all the accused persons were guilty and they were awarded life sentence in respect of offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 149 IPC and different other sentences which were directed to run concurrently by the learned Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay in Sessions Case No.248 of 1996. Only three appellants questioned the conviction and the sentence and three appeals were disposed of by the impugned judgment as noted above.

2. Prosecution version which led to the trial of the accused persons is essentially as follows: On 15.12.1995 at about 2330 hrs. complainant Sahida Shaikh (PW1) was going to Sulabh Sauchalaya (Public Toilet) situated at Prabuddha Nagar Hutments, Suweree, Wadala, Bombay-15. When she was passing near the house of Subhash Kharkhare, she noticed Vitthai, Shiva, Krishna, Mohd. Ali, Nitin, Milind and Sandeep standing near the heap of garbage near the said Sulabh Sauchalaya. The B.M.C. street light and the lights of nearby houses were sufficient for the purpose of identification. She also noticed that Babu came out of the house of Subhash Khandale keeping his hands around the shoulder of Yasin (hereinafter referred to as `deceased') and they were talking and going towards the said Sauchalaya. She was at a short distance. The said persons who were standing near the garbage heap, came near the Yasin and Babu. Then Babu removed his hand from the shoulder of Yasin and started abusing Yasin. Yasin objected to that. At that time Milind caught right hand of Yasin, Sandeep caught left hand of Yasin, Nitin caught head and hairs of Yasin from behind. Then Babu removed a sharp edged weapon from under his pant and shirt and started giving blows on the stomach of Yasin. Shiva, also took out sharp edged weapon which he was hiding on his person and said "Maro Sale Ko", and gave blows with the said weapon on the stomach and different parts on Yasin. Vitthal, Mohd. Ali and Krishna also gave blows with the weapons in their hands. Yasin was shouting "Ma Bachao, Bachao", then he went little ahead and fell down near Diamond Electric Store. One taxi was coming from the direction of Hindu Cemetery. Shiva, Vitthal, Babu, Krishna, Mohd. Ali sat in the said Taxi, threatened the driver of the Taxi, Nitin got down from the taxi and said taxi sped away towards the Jarbani Road. Nitin, Milond and Sandeep ran away towards the Cemetery. Hearing her shouts, her husband Mohd. Naseem, Subhash Khandare, Salim, Naresh and other persons came running there. Salim and Naresh removed Yasin to the KEM Hospital. She also went to the Hospital with her mother and came to know that Yasin had expired. EPR Constable Vishwas B. Sarate (PW15) was on duty at KEM Hospital, recorded the report of said incident which is at Exh.P-77 and passed on the information to PC22794 who was on duty at RAK Marg Police Station. PSI Chorge (PW12) who was Station House Officer on duty went to the KEM Hospital, recorded the statement of complainant PW-1 obtained running C.R. number which was 431/95, scribed the inquest report of Yasin which is at Exh.P-22 [admitted under Section 294 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short the `Cr.P.C.')]. Thereafter, police party visited scene of offence and scribed the spot panchanama which is Exh.P-32. After returning to the Police Station, he treated the statement of Bah


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top