Certainly. Here are the key points from the provided legal document:

• Without a formal physical partition of an undivided landed property, a co-sharer cannot lawfully put a vendee into possession of the entire property, even if they have a right to transfer their undivided share (!) (!) .

• A purchaser of an undivided interest from a co-sharer does not acquire title to a specific, defined share until a formal partition is effected either amicably or through court decree (!) (!) .

• The legal position is that a sale of undivided share does not automatically confer possession of the entire property to the vendee; instead, the vendee's rights are limited to seeking partition and obtaining their specific share (!) (!) .

• The sale of undivided interest by a co-sharer is valid, but possession cannot be handed over unless the property is partitioned by mutual agreement or court order (!) .

• In this case, the court held that the entire property belonged to the deceased and was jointly owned by the heirs, with each holding an undivided half share in all the properties (!) (!) .

• The co-sharers could not sell more than their respective shares, nor could they deliver possession of the entire property until it was partitioned (!) .

• The sale deed executed by a co-sharer for the entire property was deemed null and void to the extent of the other co-sharer’s undivided share, as the property remained joint and unpartitioned (!) (!) .

• The court emphasized that possession of an undivided share cannot be lawfully transferred or handed over until the property is partitioned, reinforcing that only rights to seek partition are conferred by such sales (!) (!) .

• The court dismissed the appeal, affirming that the undivided nature of the property and the lack of formal partition prevented the vendee from claiming possession of the entire property, and that the legal ownership remained with the co-sharers until partition (!) .

• The judgment included a direction for the defendant to hand over possession of their respective undivided share of the property to the plaintiff within three months, failing which the plaintiff could seek enforcement through appropriate proceedings (!) .

These points collectively stress that in property law, especially concerning co-ownership, physical partition or court-approved division is essential before a co-sharer can transfer or possess a specific, defined part of the property.