SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(SC) 590

Supreme Court of India
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.N. AGRAWAL, THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE
G.S. SINGHVI & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AFTAB ALAM
Nature Lovers Movement
Versus
State of Kerala & Others
CIVIL APPEAL NO.2116 OF 2000
Decided on : 30-03-2009

Advocates appeared: For the Appellant:-----For the Respondents: ----

IMPORTANT POINTS
If no decision is taken by State Government to regularize pre-25.10.1980 occupation/encroachment, no order could be passed without prior approval of Central Government.
Act 1980 is applicable to all forests irrespective of the ownership or classification thereof.
Even if any forest land has been used for non-forest purpose prior to the enforcement of the Act, the tenure of such activity cannot be extended without prior approval of the Central Government.

Headnote:Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 – Section 2 – Pre-25.10.1980 occupation/encroachment of forest land – No decision taken by State Government to regularize pre-25.10.1980 occupation/encroachment – No order could be passed without prior approval of Central Government – Act is applicable to all forests irrespective of the ownership or classification thereof – Even if any forest land has been used for non-forest purpose prior to the enforcement of the Act, the tenure of such activity cannot be extended without prior approval of the Central Government – Instantly, State Government regularizing pre-1977 occupation of 28588.159 hectares of forest land with approval of Central Government – High Court rightly refusing to nullify the same – As regards 10,000 hectares of forest land, State has not taken any decision – Contention pre-mature. (Para 18, 24, 25, 26)

       (1985) 3 SCC 643; (1987) 1 SCC 213; 1993 Supp (3) SCC 115; 1995 Supp (2) SCC 117; (1997) 2 SCC 267 – Relied upon

       Facts of the case:

       Whether Section 2 of the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 is prospective in operation and whether the Government of Kerala could, without obtaining prior approval of the Central Government grant pattas/lease hold rights to the unauthorised occupants/encroachers of forest land are the questions which arise for determination in this appeal.

       The appellant, which is a society formed for protection of environment and ecology in the State of Kerala, challenged the decision of the government to regularize unauthorised occupation/encroachment of forest lands by filing writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution. It prayed for grant of a declaration that the Government of Kerala is not entitled to dereserve the reserved forest or permit use of forest land for any non-forest purpose without obtaining approval of the Central Government in terms of Section 2(iii) of the 1980 Act. The appellant further prayed that pattayams (title deeds) issued in respect of forest land without obtaining approval of the Central Government should be quashed.

       The Full Bench of the High Court after a detailed discussion on the issues of locus standi of the appellant, constitutional imperatives, sustainable development and environment protection recoded its observations and conclusions and held that the 1980 Act is prospective and is not applicable to the cases involving use of forest land for non-forest purpose prior to 25.10.1980.

       Finding of the Court:

       Conclusion No.D recorded by the High Court in para 103 of the impugned judgment is legally unsustainable.

       Result:

       Appeal disposed of.

Judgment :-

G.S. Singhvi, J.

1. Whether Section 2 of the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 (for short ‘the 1980 Act) is prospective in operation and whether the Government of Kerala could, without obtaining prior approval of the Central Government grant pattas/lease hold rights to the unauthorised occupants/encroachers of forest land are the questions which arise for determination in this appeal filed against the order of the Full Bench of the Kerala High Court.

2. TheIndian society has, for many centuries, been aware and conscious of the necessity of protecting environment and ecology. Sages and Saints of India lived in forests. Their preaching’s contained in Vedas, Upanishadas, Smritis etc. are ample evidence of the societys respect for plants, trees, earth, sky, air, water and every form of life. The main moto of social life is to live in harmony with nature. It was regarded as a sacred duty of every one to protect them. In those days, people worshipped trees, rivers and sea which were treated as belonging to all living creatures. The children

.were educated by elders of the society about the necessity of keeping the environment clean and protecting earth, rivers, sea, forests, trees, flora fauna and every species of life.

3. With a view to make provision for better protection and management of forests in the State, Maharaja of Travancore enacted "The Travancore Forest Regulations of 1068" [for short, "the Regulations"]. Clause 3 of the Regulations provided that Diwan of the State could, with the sanction of Maharaja constitute any land at the disposal of Government a reserved forest after following the procedure prescribed in Clause 4, i.e., publication of notification in Government Gazette containing proposal for declaring the particular land as a reserved forest, holding of inquiry by the Forest Settlement Officer and issue of proclamation under Clause 6 inviting claims from the affected persons. Clause 7 of the Regulations contained a bar against acquisition of right in or over the land included in the proclamation between the date of publication of proclamation and the date fixed by final notification to be issued under Clause 18. It was also provided that no fresh clearings for cultivation or for any other purpose shall be made on the land to be declared as reserved forest except with the written permission of the Forest Settlement Officer. Clauses 8 to 17 contained procedure for dealing with the claims of the individuals, disposal thereof by the Forest Settlement Officer, hearing of appeals by Zila Court and the High Court. Clause 20 of the Regulations provided for dereservation of reserved forest. Clause 21 provided for penalties against trespass and damage to reserved forest and acts prohibited in such forests. In terms of Clause 22 of the Regulations, the Government could make rules to regulate the use of pastures and natural produce of any land at the disposal of the Government, which may not have been included in a reserved forest. By virtue of Clause 25, the Government was empowered to issue notification for regulating or prohibiting vegetation in any forest or waste land not belonging to the Government, the breaking up or clearing of land or the firing or clearing of vegetation. If the owner of the land was to decline compliance of the directions contained in the notification, the Government could resume the forest or land on lease for a specified period.

4. Notwithstanding the enactment of afore-mentioned Regulations, parts of reserved forests in the erstwhile State of Travancore were unauthorisedly occupied by landless persons who undertook agricultural operations for their survival. In 1940, the Government of the State of Travancore sanctioned ‘Kuthakappattom grants in the reserved forests. Thereafter, a policy was framed for leasing out forest lands to individuals, co-operative societies and associations for cultivation of food crops. In 1944, Maharaja of Travancore made Kuthakappattom Rules for grant of leas

















































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top