SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(SC) 148

ARIJIT PASAYAT, ASOK KUMAR GANGULY
State of M. P. – Appellant
Versus
Kashiram – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant:Ms. Vibha Datta Makhija, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Shiv Sagar Tiwari, Advocate.

Judgment:

Dr. Arijit Pasayat, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment rendered by a learned Single Judge of the Madhya Pradesh High Court. The respondents faced trial for alleged commission of offences punishable under Section 307 read with Sections 149 and 148 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the `IPC). Learned Additional Sessions Judge, Shihore, found the accused respondents guilty and sentenced each to undergo rigorous imprisonment for five years with fine and 6 months rigorous imprisonment for the other two offences. By the impugned judgment the High Court held that the appropriate conviction would be under Section 326 read with Section 149 IPC. Custodial sentence was reduced to the period already undergone, while the fine amount of Rs.500/-was enhanced to Rs.20,000/-.

3. Prosecution version as unfolded during trial is as follows:

On 21.7.1987 at about 4 Oclock in the evening the complainant-victim Jai Singh (PW5) was at the grass field for the purpose of grazing the cattle. The wife of respondent Lila Kishan and wife of Bapulal came there to collect some leaves in the field. Thereafter on account of some earlier enmity the respondents armed w




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top