SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(SC) 1397

S.B.SINHA, CYRIAC JOSEPH
Baidyanath Ayurved Bhawan Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


JUDGMENT

S.B. Sinha, J.—

1. Leave granted.

2. Appellant-ShreeBaidyanath Ayurved Bhawan Pvt. Ltd. (for short, ‘the Company) is a company registered under the Indian Companies Act, 1956. It appointed M/s. S. Bhatia Enterprises, Ludhiana (for short, ‘the firm’) as its Carrying and Forwarding Agent under a contract. The company through its General Manager, Y.P. Sharma, lodged a First Information Report before the PS Kotwali, Jhansi on or about 2.11.2001. The case was ultimately transferred to the Court of CJM Chandigarh by this Court by an order dated 24.2.2003.

3. The respondents herein filed an application for grant of anticipatory bail. By reason of an order dated 25.2.2005 the High Court, while granting anticipatory bail for one month asked the respondents to approach the Court of CJM to seek for regular bail. Respondents filed an application seeking correction of a typographical error in the order dated 25.2.2005 which was allowed by reason of an order dated 24.3.2005.

The respondents instead of appearing before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, filed an application for regular bail before the Additional Sessions Judge, Chandigarh. The learned Additional Sessions Judge, by order date















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top