D.K.JAIN, H.L.DATTU
Ram Sukh – Appellant
Versus
Dinesh Aggarwal – Respondent
JUDGMENT
D.K. Jain, J.—
1. This appeal under Section 116A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (for short the ‘Act’) is directed against the judgment and order dated 15th January, 2008, rendered by the High Court of Uttaranchal at Nainital in Writ Petition No.03 of 2007 (M/S). By the impugned order, the High Court, upholding the preliminary objection raised by the first respondent, has dismissed the election petition mainly on the ground that it did not comply with the mandatory requirement of furnishing material facts so as to disclose cause of action and was not supported by an affidavit in the prescribed form.
2. Election to the State Legislative Assembly of Uttaranchal (now Uttarakhand) was held on 21st February, 2007. The results were declared on 27th February, 2007. The first respondent, who had contested the election as an Indian National Congress candidate, was declared elected. The appellant (hereinafter referred to as the ‘election petitioner’) having lost the election, as a candidate of the Nationalist Congress Party, challenged the election of the first respondent by filing an election petition under Section 80 read with Section 100(1)(b) and (d) of the Act. T
Ravinder Singh Vs. Janmeja Singh & Ors.2000 (8) SCC 191
Jagan Nath Vs. Jaswant Singh and Ors.
Mahadeorao Sukaji Shivankar Vs. Ramaratan Bapu & Ors (2004) 7 SCC 181.
Samant N. Balkrishna & Anr. Vs. George Fernandez & Ors(1969) 3 SCC 238
Virender Nath Gautam Vs. Satpal Singh & Ors. (2007) 3 SCC 617 Relied. (Para 15)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.