Judgment :

Dr. Arijit Pasayat, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. Challenge in this appeal is to the order passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (in short `National Commission). By the impugned order the Commission dismissed the petition. Challenge in the revision petition before the National Commission was to the order passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Panchkula (in short `District Forum) as confirmed by the order passed by the State Disputes Redressal Commission, Haryana, (in short the `State Commission). The complaint was filed under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short the `Act). The grievance was that the complainant purchased a shop in an auction in 1993 and had deposited a sum of Rs.82,000/-. He had further deposited a sum of Rs.2,07,000/-. Since further payment was not forthcoming there was no area development and the appellant authority resumed the plot. Against this, appeal was filed before the Administrator of the appellant authority who allowed the appeal and fixed schedule of payments. An undertaking was filed before the appellate authority by way of an undertaking that he was ready to pay the balance amount as p