SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(SC) 1678

TARUN CHATTERJEE
D. D. Vaishnav – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant:Jayant K. Mehta and Dr. Kailash Chand, Advocates. For the Respondents:B.S. Banthia and Vikas Upadhyay, Advocates.

Judgment :

Leave granted.

2. This is an appeal from an order dated 1st of August, 2007 passed by the High Court of M.P. at Jabalpur in Writ Appeal No. 1142 of 2007 filed under Section 2(1) of the M.P. Uccha Nyayalaya (Khand Nyaya Peeth ko Appeal) Adhiniyam, 2005, by which the Division Bench of the High Court had rejected the application for condonation of delay of 589 days in filing the appeal against an order dated 20th of October, 2005 of the learned Single Judge of the High Court in W.P. (s) 7865 of 2004.

3. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties and examined the impugned order as well as the application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal. Having examined the averments made in the application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal and after hearing the learned counsel for the parties, we are satisfied that the application for condonation of delay of 589 days in preferring the appeal must be allowed as the statements in the application for condonation of delay, in our view, do constitute sufficient cause in not preferring the appeal within the period of limitation. Accordingly, the application for condonation of delay in preferring the appeal is allowe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top