SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(SC) 1439

TARUN CHATTERJEE, AFTAB ALAM
Mummidi Apparao (D) Tr. LRs. – Appellant
Versus
Nagarjuna Fertilisers & Chem. Ltd. – Respondent


Judgment :

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The line in para 1 of the Judgment dated 21st of November, 2008, namely, In course of hearing, counsel appearing for the claimants/landholders stated that they accepted the compensation fixed by the High Court and did not wish to challenge the High Court Judgment any longer; hence, SLP (Civil) Nos. 3635 and 3711 of 2007 are dismissed as not pressed" be read as under :-

"In course of hearing, counsel appearing for the claimants/landholders stated that they accepted the compensation fixed by the High Court and did not wish to challenge the High Court Judgment any longer; hence, SLP (Civil) Nos. 3635 and 3711 of 2007 are dismissed."

IAs are disposed of accordingly.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top