SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(SC) 176

B.N.AGARWAL, G.S.SINGHVI
Minakshi Gaur – Appellant
Versus
Chitranjan Gaur – Respondent


Judgment :

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The petition filed by the wife Smt. Minakshi Gaur under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was dismissed by Family Court, Agra. That order was confirmed by the High Court in Criminal Revision No.222 of 2005. Criminal Appeal No.1080 of 2008 arising out of the special leave petition filed against the order of the High Court was disposed of by this Court on 14th July, 2008, directing the husband to pay maintenance at the rate of Rs.5,000/- per month from 1st November, 1998 till 31st July, 2008 in instalments. The current and future amount of maintenance were also directed to be paid by 15th day of the following month. After sometime, the husband, Chitranjan Gaur filed Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No.13897 of 2008 for recall of order dated 14th July, 2008. During the pendency of that petition, the parties have settled all their disputes and grievances and filed compromise petition.

We have gone through the compromise petition. In our view, the compromise is lawful. Accordingly, while maintaining our order dated 14th July, 2008, granting leave, we recall other portions of that order and disposed of the criminal miscell







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top