Holicow Pictures – Appellant
Versus
Prem Chandra Mishra – Respondent
Judgement
1. Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. :-Leave granted.
2. Challenge in this appeal is to the order passed by a Division Bench of the Patna High Court disposing the writ petition filed by the respondent No.1 styled as a "Public Interest Litigation". The order gave certain directions and nullifying certain allotments of land made in favour of respondent No. 5. In the writ petition action of the State Government of Bihar in granting appellant through its Director Prakash Jha land pieces in the Industrial areas in Patna, Hajipur, Muzaffarpur, Sitamarhi and Buxar. The writ petitioner alleged that the said Prakash Jha, Director of present appellant who was respondent No. 5 in the writ petition was given land in return of services rendered by him to help the present Chief Minister to win last assembly elections. It was alleged that the action of the Government amounted to doling out valuable State property as largess at throw away prices for political considerations.
3. The writ petition was filed, and was claimed to be, in public interest. The respondent described himself as the Chief Spokesperson of the Indian National Congress, a recognizd political party. His party contested the previous e
REFERRED TO : Dattaraj Nathuji Thaware v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Ashok Kumar Singh v. Union of India and Ors.
Dr. B. K. Subbarao v. Mr. K. Parasaran
Andhra Pradesh State Financial Corporation v. M/s. GAR Re-Rolling Mills and Anr.
Kazi Lhendup Dorji v. Central Bureau of Investigation
State of Maharashtra v. Prabhu
K. R. Srinivas v. R. M. Premchand
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.