SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(SC) 1133

Macson Marbles – Appellant
Versus
UOI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
.

Judgement

ORDER :- An Industrial unit run by M/s. Diamond Marbles Pvt. Ltd.-respondent No. 4 was brought to sale in terms of Section 29 of the State Financial Corporation Act, 1951 (for short, the State Act) by Rajasthan Financial Corporation-respondent No. 3. Appellant before us participated in auction and its bid having been accepted took possession of the said unit on 28-8-1987 pursuant to the agreement entered into between them. On 4-12-1987, the Additional Collector of Central Excise adjudicated in a proceeding arising out of show cause notice issued under Section 11-A of the Central Excise Act to respondent No. 4 in relation to certain goods that are said to have been removed between 13-8-1986 and 23-8-1986 and excise duty of Rs. 1,04,586.17 and penalty of Rs. 3 lakhs was levied and demanded.

2. A letter was sent by the Central Excise Department to the appellant demanding a sum of Rs. 4,07,291.75 pursuant to the adjudication order made against respondent No. 4. The appellant in his letter to the Department contended that it had no liability to pay the excise dues of respondent No. 4. The Department not having acceded to it, a writ petition was filed in the High Court challengin








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top