SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(SC) 545

Provident Fund Inspector, Faridabad – Appellant
Versus
Jaipur Textile, Faridabad – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
.

Judgement

ORDER :- We have heard learned counsel for the parties. We set aside the judgment passed by the High Court in each of these cases. In view of the statement made by M/s. T.V.S.N. Chari and P.H. Parekh, learned counsel for the respondents on behalf of some of the respondents that they have paid all the arrears of Provident Fund in respect of which the prosecution was instituted we direct that the prosecution against them shall not be proceeded with. If any of the respondents has not paid all the arrears in respect of which the prosecution has been instituted they may deposit whatever arrears are due from them on or before 31st December, 1986 and if they do so the prosecution against them shall come to all end. If they do not pay the arrears accordingly the prosecution shall be proceeded with. The order

will not serve as a precedent as it is passed in the peculiar facts and circumstances of these cases.

2. The Criminal Appeals and Special Leave Petition are disposed of accordingly.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top