Judgement

CHINNAPPA REDDY, J. :-The appellant is the sub-tenant of a part of the building of which the respondent is the tenant. The appellant carries on the business of dyeing while the respondent carries on business in handloom sarees. The respondent filed a petition under Sec. 10 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, for the eviction of the appellant on the grounds of wilful default in payment of rent, commission of acts of nuisance, denial of title and requirement of the premises for the respondents own use and occupation in connection with a dyeing factory which he proposed to set up and expansion of the existing business. All the grounds were negatived, concurrently, by the Rent Controller and the Appellate authority on a revision petition filed under Section 25 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act. The High Court allowed the application for eviction on the last of the grounds, setting aside the concurrent finding of the Rent Controller and the Appellate Authority on that question. The principal submision of Dr. Y. S. Chitale learned counsel for the appellant was that the High Court exceeded its jurisdiction in interfering, in the exerci