SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(SC) 1653

MARKANDEY KATJU, ASOK KUMAR GANGULY
BECIL – Appellant
Versus
Arraycom India Ltd. – Respondent


ORDER

Civil Appeal No.6978 of 2009 @ SLP(C) 5461/2009

1. Leave granted.

2. This Appeal has been filed against the impugned judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court of Delhi dated 02nd February, 2009 passed in Writ Petition(C) No.7865 of 2008.

3. The facts in brief are: Respondent No.2 (Prasar Bharti) issued a Notice Inviting Tender (NIT) on 20th October, 2006 for the supply of two transmitters of 1000 KW (or 1 MW) each. The bidding was a two-stage process involving a technical bid and a financial bid. There is no dispute that the respondent No.1(Arraycom) and the appellant (BECIL) were both technically qualified.

4. In respect of the financial bid which was opened on 30th July, 2007, the quotation given by Arraycom was for a sum of Rs.51.57 crores and it was stated therein that: “1. Prices at INR including Custom Duty, Packaging, Forwarding, Freight & Insurance.

2. CST (Central Sales Tax) is inclusive in the above prices. AIR will have to give concessional forms C/D.

3. Billing will be done from our Noida office.

4. Validity of offer upto 120 days from the date of opening (I.e. up to 16.06.2007).”

5. The quotation given by BECIL was for Rs.47.35 crores and it was stated tha



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top