SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(SC) 1682

AFTAB ALAM, TARUN CHATTERJEE
Mohd. Ismail – Appellant
Versus
Dinkar Vinayakrao Dorlikar – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Tarun Chatterjee, J.—

1. Leave granted.

2. This appeal is directed against the Judgment and Order dated 28th of September, 2006 passed by a learned Single Judge of the High Court of Judicature of Bombay at Nagpur Bench in W.P. (c) 5075 of 2005, by which the High Court had dismissed the writ petition and affirmed the order of the Additional Collector, Nagpur dated 22 nd of July, 2005, which was filed against the order of the Rent Controller, Nagpur in Revenue Case No. 264/A-71(2)/92- 93 dated 12th of November, 1999 thereby allowing the application of the respondent for grant of permission to issue quit notice under Clause 13(3)(vi) of the Rent Control Order, 1949.

3. The case made out by the respondents in his eviction petition may be summarized as follows :- The appellant is a tenant in respect of a Shop Room measuring about 10 x 26 (hereinafter referred to as “the shop in question”) under the respondent for the last more than 20 years at a monthly rental of Rs.600/- payable at the end of each English Calendar month. In the application for eviction, the respondent had alleged that since he was jobless and had to maintain a family of ten members and had no source of income

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top