SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(SC) 1817

J.M.PANCHAL, K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
V. D. Dubey (dead) by Lrs. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

K.S. Radhakrishnan, J.—

1. The question that arises for consideration in these cases is whether the Rule 2423-A of the Indian Railway Establishment Code as amended, which provides for adding certain period of service, to the qualifying service for superannuation pension, would be available to those who retire from service after 31st March, 1960, irrespective of the fact whether the recruitment rules at the time of their appointment had contained such a specific provision or not.

2. The Railway Administration took up the stand that only if the recruitment rules conferred such a provision the benefit of added years of service, for superannuation pension, would be available. The High Court in all these cases took a consistent view that what is relevant is the date of retirement, not the date of entry in service.

3. Rule 2423-A as it originally stood, stated that an officer appointed to his service or post on or after 1st April, 1960 was eligible to add to his service qualifying for superannuation pension, the actual period not exceeding 1/4th of the length of his service or actual period by which his age at the time of recruitment exceeded 25 years or a period of five years










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top