SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(SC) 1844

TARUN CHATTERJEE, S.S.NIJJAR
Babu Bhai Thiba – Appellant
Versus
Ashok Ravi Shankar Narval – Respondent


ORDER

Surinder Singh Nijjar, J. —

1. Leave granted. Heard the learned counsel.

2. Since this appeal by special leave is directed against an order granting interim relief the same may be disposed of by briefly stating the relevant facts.

3. The appellant claims to have lent certain sums of money to respondent No.2, namely, Rafique Sarang. Subsequently, the disputes arose between the parties, which were referred to a named Arbitrator on 29.5.2001. The Arbitrator passed an award declaring the respondent No.2 liable to pay a sum of Rs.78,96,300/- to the appellant i.e. Babu Bhai Thiba. The appellant sought execution of the Award in the Bombay High Court. It appears that an order was passed by the Bombay High Court in the execution application on 1.8.2003 directing attachment of several properties including the premises No.108 Palm Spring CGHS Limited, First Floor, Swamy Samarth Nagar, Andheri (W), Mumbai. At this stage, respondent No.1, Ashok Ravi Shankar Naval, filed Chamber Summons No.1277/2003 seeking an order for raising attachment of the aforesaid premises, on the ground that he is the owner, thereof. In support of his plea he relied upon two agreements dated 1.10.1999 executed b



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top