SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(SC) 540

S.B.SINHA, ASOK KUMAR GANGULY
Hari – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Judgment :-

Ganguly, J.

1. This appeal has been filed by Hari s/o Mansingh Rathod impugning the judgment and

order of conviction passed by the Aurangabad Bench of Bombay High Court in Criminal Appeal No.523 of 2004.

2.2. The appeal to the High Court was taken from a judgment dated 20.7.2004 rendered by the First Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad in Sessions Case No. 248 of 2003.

3.3. Before the Trial Court there were several accused persons. The Trial Court in its judgment only convicted the appellant herein and accused No.2 - Baliram s/o Janu Rathod.

4.4. Appellant - Hari was convicted for an offence punishable under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code and was sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.100/- in default, simple imprisonment for ten days.

5.5. Accused No.2 - Baliram was convicted for an offence punishable under Section 324 of the Code and was sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for three years and to pay a fine of Rs.500/- and in default to suffer simple imprisonment for one month.

6.6. Both the accused were granted benefit under Section 428 of the Code and they were acquitted of the rest of the charges.

7.7. Other accuse



















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top