SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(SC) 860

TARUN CHATTERJEE, H.L.DATTU
Malwa Vanaspati & Chemical Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Rajendra – Respondent


Judgment :-

Tarun Chatterjee, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. Delay condoned.

3. On 11th of January, 2008, this Court passed the following order :-

"Issue notice limited to question whether the respondent was entitled to full back wages or not. Issue notice also on the application for condonation of delay."

4. The respondent filed an application before the Labour Court alleging that he was illegally terminated by an oral order dated 5th of March, 1998 and that he was not given any Show Cause Notice nor was he paid retrenchment compensation.

5. The appellant contested the said application alleging that the services of the respondent had not been terminated and since the services had not been terminated, the question of payment of retrenchment compensation or issuance of Show Cause Notice did not arise at all.

6. In February, 2000, in the light of the above matter, the Labour Court directed the respondent to report for duty and it is now an admitted position that the respondent reported for duty on that date.

7. By a final award, the Labour Court passed an award on 27th of September, 2002, directing the appellant to take him on duty and directed payment of back wages. In appeal, the Industria



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top