DEEPAK VERMA, B.SUDERSHAN REDDY
G. Suryakumari – Appellant
Versus
B. Chandramouli – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Deepak Verma, J.—
1. Leave granted.
2. Defendants-appellants, feeling aggrieved by the judgment and decree pronounced by learned Single Judge of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad, in respondents’ S.A. No. 541/2002 decided on 20.2.2006, are before us challenging the same on variety of grounds.
3. Respondents herein as plaintiffs had filed Original Suit No. 5731 of 1994, against the present appellants/ defendants, for the relief of perpetual injunction restraining them from interfering in any manner into their peaceful possession and enjoyment over the Suit Schedule Property to an extent of 1,200 sq. yards forming part of House No. 6-3-584/31/B covered by Survey Nos. 94, 95 and 96 of Ward No. 3 out of 38,382 sq. yards belonging to M/s. Gramodyog Cooperative Housing Society, situated at Khairtabad, Hyderabad.
4. According to the plaint averments, respondents/plaintiffs contended that schedule property is part of 50,000 sq. yards covered by Survey Nos. 94, 95 and 96. It originally belonged to Dr. Ahmed Mirza from whom Smt. K. Parvathi Devi and four others purchased the same under registered sale deed dated 17.3.1961. Thereafter, M/s. Gramodyog Cooperative Housing
Gajpat Singh v. Sudhan (Died) Legal by L.Rs Hukam Chand. AIR 1985 P&H 135
Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Anr. v. Kamla Mills Ltd.
Nityananda Kar & Anr. v. State of Orissa & Ors. 1991 Supp (2) SCC 516; Relied. (Para 21)
Ishwar Das Jain (Dead) Through LRs v. Sohan Lal (Dead) by LRs (2000) 1 SCC 434 : AIR 2000 SC 426
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.