R.V.RAVEENDRAN, G.S.SINGHVI
State of Haryana – Appellant
Versus
Hem Lata Gupta – Respondent
JUDGMENT
G.S. Singhvi, J. —
1. These appeals are directed against the orders of the Punjab and Haryana High Court whereby the alleged denial of advance increments to the writ petitioners (respondents herein) has been declared illegal and the appellants have been directed to grant them increments in terms of the instructions issued by the Government of Punjab vide Memo No. 6462-ED-II(2)60/32640 dated 1.9.1960 and the Government of Haryana vide letter No.152-Edu-II-69/540 dated 5.1.1968.
2. The respondents joined service as teachers in different categories i.e., Lecturers, Masters/Mistresses, Language Teachers and Physical Training Instructors either in the undivided State of Punjab or the newly formed State of Haryana, which came into being with effect from 1.11.1966. Some of the respondents possessed post-graduate qualifications at the time of entry in the service while others claim to have acquired such qualifications after joining the service. Smt. Hem Lata Gupta and others filed Writ Petition No. 18638/1997 for issue of a mandamus to the concerned authorities of the Government of Haryana to give them benefit of 2/3 advance increments from the date of acquiring post-graduate qual
Wazir Singh v. State of Haryana 1995 (Supp) 3 SCC 697
State of Punjab v. Kirpal Singh Bhatia (1975) 4 SCC 740
Chaman Lal v. State of Haryana (1987) 3 SCC 113
State of Haryana v. Kamal Singh Saharawat (1999) 8 SCC 44
Punjab Higher Qualified Teachers’ Union v.State of Punjab (1988) 2 SCC 407
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.