SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(SC) 128

S.H.KAPADIA, H.L.DATTU
Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax – Appellant
Versus
Hotel Blue Moon – Respondent


JUDGMENT

H.L. Dattu, J.

1) Leave granted in all the special leave petitions.

2) These six appeals have been heard together. They arise out of similar facts and the question of law arising therefrom is the same.

3) The facts in the lead case are : This is an appeal against the judgment of the High Court of Guwahati in a appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’, and the point that is raised for our determination is, whether issue of notice under Section 143(2) of the Act within the prescribed time for the purpose of block assessment under Chapter XIV-B of the Act is mandatory for assessing undisclosed income detected during search conducted under Section 132 of the Act. While, according to the department, issue of a notice under Section 143(2) is not essential requirement in block assessment under Chapter XIV-B of the Act. According to the assessee, service of notice on the assessee under Section 143(2) of the Act within the prescribed period of time is a pre-requisite for framing the block assessment under Chapter XIV-B of the Act. The Appellate Tribunal held, while affirming the decision of the CIT(A) that non-issue of notice unde



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top