SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(SC) 190

R.V.RAVEENDRAN, AFTAB ALAM
Indore Municipal Corporation – Appellant
Versus
Hemalata – Respondent


JUDGMENT

R.V. Raveendran, J. —

The respondents are the owners of property bearing khasra No. 92/2 and 93 of Palasiahana (within the Municipal limits of Indore City) measuring about 0.441 hectares or 3601.4 sq.m. Mohan Lal Khimati and three others, who were originally the owners, made an application for grant of permission for development of the said land by construction of a residential-cum-commercial building, to the Town & Country Planning Department, Indore Division. The Joint Director, Town and Country Planning, by order dated 7.2.2005, granted permission in regard to the building plan for residential-cum-commercial purposes subject to approval of the said building plans by the Indore Municipal Corporation (‘Corporation’, for short) subject to the following conditions:-

(i) The land can be used for residential-cum-commercial use, if Municipal Corporation approves the building plans.

(ii) The ground coverage area (covered area) will be 33% of the land area; and the floor area ratio will be 1.5.

(iii) The height of the building will not be more than 12.0 M.

(iv) Space for parking should be provided as per the ratio specified in Land Development Rules with reference to the floor area













































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top