V.S.SIRPURKAR, TARUN CHATTERJEE
Mohd. Laiquiddin – Appellant
Versus
Kamala Devi Misra (Dead) by L. Rs. – Respondent
Judgment :-
Tarun Chatterjee, J.
These four appeals are directed against the judgment and order dated 9th of April, 2002 passed in second appeal Nos. 1048 & 1050 of 2001 of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad, by which the High Court had partly allowed the appeals and modified the order dated 17th of October, 2001 of the First Appellate Court, which affirmed the order of the Trial Court decreeing the suit for dissolution of partnership firm and other relief filed by the appellants who are appellants in C.A. Nos. 6933-34 of 2002.
2. It may be mentioned that during the pendency of the suit, the original plaintiff died and her legal representatives were substituted as plaintiffs before the trial court. The original defendant also died before the filing of the first appeal, and his legal representatives were brought on record as Appellant Nos. 2 to 6 before the first Appellate Court. For the sake of convenience, the Plaintiffs would be referred to as the Appellants and the Defendants would be referred to as the Respondents.
3. The case made out by the original plaintiff (since deceased) in her plaint was as follows:
Shri Jai Narayan Mishra, original defendant (since deceased)
Boda Narayana Murthy & Sons v. Valluri Venkata Suguna
Chandra Singh v. State of Rajasthan (2003) 6 SCC 545
Arjun Kanoji Tankar v. Santaram Kanoji Tankar (1969)3 SCC 555
Commissioner of Income Tax, Madhya Pradesh v. Dewas Cine Corporation
Malabar Fisheries Co. Calicut v. CIT
S.V. Chandra Pandian v. S.V. Sivalinga Nadar (1993) 1 SCC 589
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.