V.S.SIRPURKAR, MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA
C. I. T. , Ahmedabad – Appellant
Versus
Reliance Petroproducts Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
V.S. Sirpurkar, J. —
1.Leave granted.
2.The only question in this appeal which has been filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax-III is as to whether the respondent-assessee is liable to pay the penalty amounting to Rs.11,37,949/- under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) ordered by the Assessing Authority. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), however, deleted the said penalty. The order of the Commissioner (Appeals) was appealed against before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to “the Tribunal”) which confirmed the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) and dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue. However, the Revenue challenged the said order before the High Court which confirmed the orders passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) and the Tribunal while dismissing the Tax Appeal filed by the Revenue.
3.Few facts would be relevant.
4.The assessee is a company and the relevant Assessment Year is 2001-02. The Return was filed on 31.1.2001 declaring loss of Rs.26,54,554/-. This assessment was finalized under Section 143(3) of the Act on 25.11.2003 whereby the total income was determined at Rs.2,22,688/-. In this ass
Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi Vs. Atul Mohan Bindal [2009(9) SCC 589]
Union of India Vs.Dharamendra Textile Processors [2008(13) SCC 369]
Union of India Vs.Rajasthan Spg. & Wvg. Mills [2009(13) SCC 448]
Dilip N. Shroff Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax,Mumbai & Anr. [2007(6) SCC 329]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.