SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(SC) 325

D.K.JAIN, T.S.THAKUR
Dilawari Exporters – Appellant
Versus
Alitalia Cargo – Respondent


JUDGMENT

D.K. Jain, J. —

1.Challenge in this appeal under Section 23 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short “the Act”) is to the order dated 15th April, 2002 passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (for short “the Commission”) in Original Petition No. 156 of 1995. By the impugned order, the Commission has dismissed appellant’s complaint alleging deficiency in service on the part of M/s Alitalia Cargo, respondent No.1 in this appeal, on the ground that there was no privity of contract between the appellant and respondent No.1. Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 in this appeal are M/s Omni Marg Travels (Pvt.) Ltd., General Sales Agents and M/s Fourways Movers (P) Ltd., Cargo Clearing Agents of respondent No.1 respectively.

2.The salient facts giving rise to the present appeal are as follows:

The appellant is engaged in the business of export of readymade garments and handicrafts. They obtained an order from one M/s D.D. Sales, a concern based in New York, USA for supply of 2050 pairs of Cotton Gents Dhotis, 150 sets of Cotton Ladies Ghagra-Choli, 150 pieces of Dupatas, etc. As per the agreement between the appellant and the said concern of New York, USA, these article





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top