SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(SC) 370

R.V.RAVEENDRAN, K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN
Indowind Energy Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Wescare (I) Ltd. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

R.V. Raveendran, J.—

Leave granted.

2.The appellant and respondents 1 and 2 are companies incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956. Wescare Care (I) Ltd., the first respondent (for short ‘Wescare’), is in the business of setting up and operating/managing windfarms and generation of power from Wind Electric Generators. Subuthi Finance Ltd - second respondent (‘Subuthi’ for short) is a promoter of the appellant company - Indowind Energy Ltd., (referred to as ‘Indowind’). On 24.2.2006 an agreement of sale was entered into between Wescare and Subuthi. The agreement described “Wescare (India) Ltd. including its subsidiary RCI Power Ltd” as the “seller/Wescare”. It described Subuthi Finance Ltd. and its nominee as “buyer” and as the “promoters of Indowind Energy Ltd.” Under the said agreement, the seller agreed to transfer to the buyer certain business assets of the seller for a consideration of Rs.98.19 crores, of which Rs.24.19 crores was payable in cash and Rs.74 crores by issue of 74 lakhs shares (of the face value of Rs.10/- at a premium of Rs.90/- per share). Clause 10 of the agreement relates to arbitration. Clause 11 of the agreement relates to approval. The said clauses
































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top