SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(SC) 456

2010 (3) Supreme 767
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Dalveer Bhandari, K.S. Radhakrishnan, JJ.
Project Officer, Irdp and Ors. — Appellants
versus
P.D. Chacko — Respondent
Civil Appeal No. 4392 of 2010
(Arising out of SLP)No.14998 of 2007)
Decided on : 11-5-2010

IMPORTANT POINT
Exception clause, normally a part of the enacting section unlike a proviso which follows an enacting part; has to be strictly interpreted and cannot be assumed but be proved.

Headnote:(a) Service Law – Age of superannuation – Rule 60(b) r/w Rule 12(16A), KSR Part-I – In order to get benefit of Rule 60(b) two conditions have to be satisfied – First, the government servant must have been in last grade service as on 07.04.1970 – Second, the benefit of Clause ‘b’ would be available only as long as such person continues to be in the last grade service. (Para 9)

       (b) Interpretation of statute – Exception clause, is normally, part of the enacting section, unlike a proviso which follows an enacting part – An exception clause has to be strictly interpreted and cannot be assumed but be proved. (Paras12 and 13)

       (c) Service Law – Rule 60(b) r/w Rule 14E, KSR – Aided school not included in last grade service – Respondent not entitled to continuation of service till 60 years of age – The service in aided school can only be considered as qualifying service up to the normal retirement age of other government servants for the purposes of pension. (Para 16)

       Facts of the case:

       The question that falls for consideration in this case is whether the respondent who entered service in an aided school on 25.06.1968 and worked as a full time menial upto 09.04.1976 is entitled to get the benefit of Rule 60(b) Part-I Kerala Service Rules, (KSR for short) so as to continue in government service upto 60 years of age.

       Finding of the Court:

       Aided school having not been included in last grade service, respondent not entitled to continuation of service till 60 years of age.

JUDGMENT

K.S. Radhakrishnan, J. —

1.Leave granted.

2.The question that falls for our consideration in this case is whether the respondent who was in service as on 07.04.1970 as a full time menial in an aided school is entitled to get the benefit of Rule 60(b) Part-I Kerala Service Rules, (KSR for short) so as to continue in government service upto 60 years of age.

3.The respondents entered service in an aided school on 25.06.1968 and worked as a full time menial upto 09.04.1976. He resigned from the post and joined as a Peon in the Tribal Welfare Department of the Government of Kerala on 10.04.1976. Respondent had raised a claim that he was entitled to continue in service up to 60 years of age as per Rule 60(b) Part-I KSR since he was working as a full time menial in an aided school as on 07.04.1970 and continued to be in the last grade till he attained the age of 55 years. His claim was rejected by the Department vide order No.E-49227/ 2001.

4.Feeling aggrieved by that order he preferred a writ petition O.P.No.29317/2001 before the Kerala High Court. Learned Single Judge of the Kerala High Court on 25.05.2006 allowed the writ petition holding that had he remained in the aided school service he would have continued upto 60 years of age, hence he was entitled to the benefit of Rule 60(b) Part-I KSR. Learned single judge gave a direction to allow the respondent to continue in service till he attained 60 years of age and to settle his pension and other benefits accordingly. State of Kerala and Others preferred writ appeal no.35 of 2007 before the Division Bench of the Kerala High Court and the appeal was dismissed on 15th January, 2007 at the admission stage. Feeling aggrieved by that judgment this appeal has been preferred by the State of Kerala and their officers.

5.Mr. G. Prakash, learned counsel appearing for the State of Kerala submitted that the High Court has committed a grave error in holding that the respondent who was working as a full time menial in an aided school as on 07.04.1970 was entitled to get the benefit of Rule 60(b) of Part-I KSR. Counsel submitted that the service in an aided school has not been included in the last grade service as defined in GO(P)82/66/PD dated 08.03.1966 and as per the government decision no.1 under Rule 14 in Part-III KSR the said period can be counted only for pensionary benefits but does not confer any right to the incumbent to continue in service upto 60 years of age. Consequently, provisional pension has already been sanctioned to the respondent considering his regular service till he attained the age of 55 years under Rule 3A Part-III KSR.

6.Ms. Beena Madhavan, learned counsel appearing for respondent submitted that the service put in by the respondent in the aided school from 25.06.1968 to 09.04.1976 should be taken into consideration for the purpose of granting benefit under Rule 60(b) of Part-I KSR. Learned counsel submitted as per Rule 29(b) of Part-III KSR past service would be counted if a person resigns from a service to join another service. Learned counsel also referred to Rule 14E of KSR Part-III and submitted that the aided school service put in by the government employee prior to his entry in service would qualify not only for the purpose of pension, but also for continuity in service upto 60 years of age. Learned counsel, therefore, submitted that respondent had satisfied all the criteria for claiming the benefit of Rule 60(b) Part-I KSR and the High Court has rightly granted the benefit.

7.The primary question that arises for consideration is whether the respondent who was in service of an aided school as on 07.04.1970 was entitled to continue in service till he attained 60 years of age as per clause ‘b’ of Rule 60 of Part-I KSR.

8.KSR was introduced by the Government of Kerala under the proviso to Article 309 of the Constitution of India with effect from 01.11.1959 and these rules are deemed to have been made under the Kerala Public Service Act (Act 19 of 1968). KSR contains
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top