R.V.RAVEENDRAN, K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN
Punjab Roadways Moga through its General Manager – Appellant
Versus
Punja Sahib Bus and Transport Co. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
K.S. Radhakrishnan, J. —
1.Leave granted in all these special leave petitions.
Facts of the first two appeals.
2.We will first deal with the first two appeals which arise out of a common order dated 21.8.2000 passed by the State Transport Commissioner (in short “the Commissioner”) exercising the powers conferred on the Regional Transport Authorities of Jalandhar, Patiala and Ferozpur. The order of the Commissioner was confirmed by the State Transport Appellate Tribunal (in short “the Tribunal”) vide its order dated 27.4.2005, but interfered with by the High Court in C.W.P No.8483/2005 and C.W.P. No.11768 of 2005 respectively with a positive direction to the Commissioner to grant Stage Carriage Permits to the private operators rejecting the claims of the State Transport Undertakings (STUs). The legality of the order of the High Court is under challenge in these two cases filed by the State of Punjab through the Commissioner and the Punjab Roadways, Moga, represented by its General Manager.
3.The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Jalandhar, published a notice in the Motor Transport Gazette, Weekly, Chandigarh in its issue dated 22.2.1999 inviting applications for the gran
Adarsh Travels Bus Service and Anr. vs. State of U.P. and Ors., (1985) 4 SCC 557
U.P.State Road Transport Corporation, Lucknow vs. Anwar Ahmad and Ors. (1997) 3 SCC 191
Ram Krishna Verma vs State of U.P.(1992) 2 SCC 620
UPSRTC and Another vs.Sanjidha Banu and Ors. (2005) 10 SCC 280; Referred. (Para 26)
M. Madan Mohan Rao &Ors. Vs. UOI & Ors. (2002) 6 SCC 348; Referred. (Para 26)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.