R.V.RAVEENDRAN, R.M.LODHA
Modern Industries – Appellant
Versus
Steel Authority of India Ltd. – Respondent
JUDGEMENT
R.M. Lodha, J. —
Leave granted.
2.Two main questions arise for consideration - first, as to the meaning of the expression, ‘amount due from a buyer, together with the amount of interest’ under sub-section (1) of Section 6 of the Interest on Delayed Payments to Small Scale and Ancillary Industrial Undertakings Act, 1993 (for short, ‘1993 Act’) and then, as to whether the Industry Facilitation Council (IFC) cannot go beyond the scope of interest on delayed payments upon the matter being referred to it by any party to dispute under sub-section (2) of Section 6.
3.M/s. Modern Industries, Rourkela (for short, ‘supplier’) got an order from the Steel Authority of India Limited - Rourkela Steel Plant (for short, ‘buyer’) on January 15, 1983 for manufacture of Right Manipulator Side Guard. The order value was Rs. 8.19 lakhs. Inter alia, the terms and conditions of the order were : (i) the job should be done exactly as specified in the drawings; (2) the alignment of bearing housings be made by the supplier and for this purpose, a spare shaft assembly would be issued against indemnity bond for checking the perfect alignment and free rotation of the shaft ; (3) the essentiality certifica
State of Kerala v. V.R. Kalliyanikutty
State of Gujarat v. Mirzapur Moti Kureshi Kassab Jamat
Bonam Satyavathi v. Addala Raghavulu
Central Bank of India v. State of Kerala
Eastern Coalfields Limited v. Sanjay Transport Agency
Assam Small Scale Industries Development Corpn. Ltd. v. J.D. Pharmaceuticals
Shakti Tubes Ltd., v. State of Bihar
Madan Mohan v. Krishan Kumar Sood
Maharashtra State Cooperative Bank Limited v. The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.