SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(SC) 517

ASOK KUMAR GANGULY, G.S.SINGHVI
Om Prakash Saini – Appellant
Versus
DCM Ltd. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

G.S. Singhvi, J. —

1.Leave granted.

2.In these appeals, prayer has been made for setting aside order dated 22.8.2008 passed by the learned Single Judge of Delhi High Court in R.A. Nos. 329 of 2007, 401 of 2007 and CM No. 11710 of 2008 in CM (M) No. 398 of 2007.

3.After retirement from the service of Indian Railways, the appellant invested Rs.1,90,000 in the Fully Secured Debentures floated by respondent No.1. The debentures were due for payment on 14th August, 1998, but just before that date, respondent No.1 vide its letter dated 16.7.1998 informed the appellant and other similarly situated persons that due to financial difficulties it will not be possible to pay the amount of maturity on the scheduled dates and a revised scheme has been worked out for payment of the dues. The relevant portions of that letter are extracted below:

“The company had in the month of February, 1997 allotted 17 months and 25 days - 19.5% Secured Redeemable Non- Convertible Private Placed Debentures of Rs.1,000/- each (Debentures) of the Series `A’. These Debentures were issued under Regular and cumulative Schemes. These Debentures are due for payment on 14th August, 1998. However, due to reasons as
























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top