P.SATHASIVAM, R.V.RAVEENDRAN
Avinash Gaikwad – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
Judgment :-
R.V. Raveendran, J.
Leave granted. Heard the parties.
2. The appellants challenge the order dated 5.5.2005 by which W.P.No.649/2005 filed by them was dismissed by the Bombay High Court.
3. A property known as Pimpalwadi at CS No.370 Tatya Gharpure Marg, Girgaon Division, Mumbai, originally belonged to Sir Harkishandas Trust. The said property consisting of several Chawls, Godowns and Sheds was acquired by the State of Maharashtra under section 41 of the Maharashtra Housing & Area Development Act, 1976 in the year 1988. Thereafter, the State Government delivered possession of the said property to the Maharashtra Housing & Area Development Authority (`MHADA' for short) on 31.1.1989 for redevelopment under Urban Renewal Scheme. However, due to certain protracted litigation between the owners of the property and Pimpalwadi Bhadekaru Sangh formed by the occupants of the said property, MHADA could not take up the reconstruction. At that stage, the said Pimpalwadi Bhadekaru Sangh, gave a proposal to MHADA to permit development of the property through M/s. Shreepati Towers – a private developer (an AOP of respondents 5 to 12 described also as "R.R. Chaturvedi & Others of M/s. Sh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.