SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(SC) 1576

J.M.PANCHAL, HARJIT SINGH BEDI
VISHNU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Abhijeet Chatterjee, DHARME

J. M. PANCHAL, J.

( 1 ) THE instant appeal by Special Leave is directed against Judgment dated August 3, 2005 rendered by Division Bench of high Court of Judicature of Rajasthan at Jaipur Bench, jaipur in D. B. Criminal Appeal Mo. 359 of 1998 by which Judgment dated April 17, 1998 passed by Learned Sessions Judge, Karauli, in sessions Case No. 9 of 1996 convicting the five appellants under Sections 302 read with 149, 325 read with 149, 323 read with 149 as well as convicting the appellant Nos. 1 and 4 under Section 147 and 148 IPC as well as sentences imposed therefore, are confirmed.

( 2 ) THE facts emerging from the record of the case are as under:

2. 1. There is a piece of land admeasuring about five Bighas situated in village Golara, Distt. Sawai Madhopur now Distt. Karauli in rajasthan. The Government allotted the said land to the father and brother of the first informant Babu Lal but the appellants and others who are Brahmins by caste were not permitting them to cultivate the same, as a result of which disputes relating to the said land were going on between Brahmins and jatavas of village Golara. The incident in question took place at about 7. 00 P. M. on august 28, 1995. Bab












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top