SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(SC) 149

ARIJIT PASAYAT, ASOK KUMAR GANGULY
AJAB SINGH – Appellant
Versus
ANTRAM – Respondent


A. K. GANGULY, J.

( 1 ) LEAVE granted.

( 2 ) THIS appeal arises out of a consolidation proceeding under the provisions of The Uttar pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land reforms Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as 'the said Act' ).

( 3 ) A revision application was filed under the provisions of the said Act by the contesting respondent Nos. 1 and 2 before the Deputy director Consolidation, Agra as they were aggrieved by the order of the Consolidation officer and the order of the Settlement Officer, consolidation and the Deputy Director reversed the findings of both the consolidation Officer and those of Settlement officer, Consolidation.

( 4 ) ONE of the grievances which has been raised by the appellants herein is that the order of Consolidation Officer dated 23. 12. 1981 and that of the Settlement Officer, consolidation dated 29. 11. 1982, have been upset by the Deputy Director, Consolidation while entertaining a revision filed by the contesting respondents on 10. 8. 1993, which according to the appellant, is barred by limitation. So the complaint is that the order which has been passed by the Deputy director Consolidation is bad in law and was passed ignoring the bar of limitatio














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top