ARIJIT PASAYAT, ASOK KUMAR GANGULY
AJAB SINGH – Appellant
Versus
ANTRAM – Respondent
A. K. GANGULY, J.
( 1 ) LEAVE granted.
( 2 ) THIS appeal arises out of a consolidation proceeding under the provisions of The Uttar pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land reforms Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as 'the said Act' ).
( 3 ) A revision application was filed under the provisions of the said Act by the contesting respondent Nos. 1 and 2 before the Deputy director Consolidation, Agra as they were aggrieved by the order of the Consolidation officer and the order of the Settlement Officer, consolidation and the Deputy Director reversed the findings of both the consolidation Officer and those of Settlement officer, Consolidation.
( 4 ) ONE of the grievances which has been raised by the appellants herein is that the order of Consolidation Officer dated 23. 12. 1981 and that of the Settlement Officer, consolidation dated 29. 11. 1982, have been upset by the Deputy Director, Consolidation while entertaining a revision filed by the contesting respondents on 10. 8. 1993, which according to the appellant, is barred by limitation. So the complaint is that the order which has been passed by the Deputy director Consolidation is bad in law and was passed ignoring the bar of limitatio
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.