SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(SC) 671

TARUN CHATTERJEE, H.L.DATTU
SHARDA SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


( 1 ) LEAVE granted.

( 2 ) CHALLENGING the judgment and order passed by the High Court of Allahabad in Writ petition No. 4436 (S/s) of 2005 dated 05. 04. 2007, the appellant is before us in this appeal.

( 3 ) THE appellant was working as Collection amin. While in service, he was served with a charge memo, inter-alia alleging, that, instead of depositing the amount by himself, he got it deposited through Peon. After holding an enquiry, he was visited with a minor penalty. Adverse entry in his confidential records by district Magistrate, Sitapur vide his order dated 31. 10. 2003. In the same order, it was informed to the appellant that payment of back wages during the period of suspension will be determined separately. Aggrieved by the order so passed, the appellant had preferred appeal before the appellate authority as provided in the Rules. The appellate authority vide his order dated 04. 04. 2005 has dismissed the appeal of the appellant.

( 4 ) THERE is yet another aspect of the matter that requires to be noticed. The competent authority by order dated 13. 09. 2004 had rejected the claim of the appellant for back wages during the period of suspension till the date of reinstatement








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top