ARIJIT PASAYAT, ASOK KUMAR GANGULY
MATHURA SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
ARIJIT PASAYAT, J.
( 1 ) LEAVE granted.
( 2 ) CHALLENGE in this appeal is to the judgment passed by the learned Single Judge of allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, allowing the appeal filed by the appellants in part. The appellants were convicted by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sultanpur, for offences punishable under Sections 307 and 324 both read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short 'ipc' ). For the offence relatable to Section 307 read with Section 34 each was sentenced for imprisonment for five years R. I. and for the offence under Section 323/34 each was sentenced for six months R. I. 2. By the impugned judgment the High Court altered the conviction to Section 324 read with Section 34 and 323 read with Section 34 IPC. It is not necessary to go into the factual aspects in detail as an application has been filed by the complainant and the accused persons stating that the occurrence took place nearly 25 years back and the parties are related to each other and, therefore, they may be permitted to compound the offences. Individual affidavits of all the parties have been filed. It is to be noted that one of the injured persons Mutra Devi has expired on 23.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.