SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(SC) 783

S.B.SINHA, LOKESHWAR SINGH PANTA
LALIT KUMAR SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


S. B. SINHA, J.

( 1 ) LEAVE granted.

( 2 ) APPLICATION of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short "the Act") in the facts and circumstances of the case is involved in this appeal which arises out of a judgment and order dated 19. 02. 2007 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Criminal Revision no. (5) of 2003.

( 3 ) M/s. Mediline India (P) Ltd. is a company registered and incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956. It had two directors, viz. , Shri Ashish narula and Shri Manish Arora. The Company took loan for a sum of Rs. 5,00,000/ -. Two cheques bearing Nos. 0989637 dated 30. 11. 1999 and 0989638 dated 10. 12. 1999 for Rs. 3,00,000/- and Rs. 2,00,000/- respectively were drawn on Vijaya Bank, Navyug Market, Ghaziabad in favour of the respondent No. 1. On presentation, they were returned unpaid with the remarks "insufficient fund".

( 4 ) A complaint petition was thereafter filed by the respondent No. 2 (complainant) against Shri Manish Arora and Shri Ashish Narula under section 138 of the Act and Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code.

( 5 ) APPELLANTS were not signatories to the cheques. Appellant No. 1 became a director of the said Company onl


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top