SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(SC) 1256

MARKANDEY KATJU, S.B.SINHA
VADLA CHANDRAIAH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates:
D.Bharathi Reddy, P.VINAY KUMAR, RANJAN MUKHERJEE, SNEHA BHASKARAN

S. B. SINHA, J.

( 1 ) DELAY condoned.

( 2 ) LEAVE granted.

( 3 ) ON 17. 10. 2000, at about 3. 30 p. m. , the deceased manik Rao, a police constable, was walking down the street. P. W. 8 (B. Narasimha) was a vendor of guava. Manik Rao picked up four guavas from his vend but did not pay the price thereof. On being asked to do so, he allegedly said that the same would be paid latter. The appellant together with his son were doing some carpentry work on the same street. Apparently, a quarrel took place between P. W.-8 (B. Narasimha) and the said Manik rao. The appellant and his son intervened. The quarrel continued for 10-15 minutes. Allegedly, Appellant hacked the deceased Manik Rao with a badze (a heavy sharp axe like instrument used in the carpentry work) causing instantaneous death of the deceased. Appellant together with his son were charged for commission of murder of the said deceased Manik Rao.

( 4 ) T he prosecution, in support of its case, examined four eye witnesses. P. W. 1s (V. Narasimha Rao), presence on the scene however, has been doubted by the learned trial Judge. Learned Sessions Judge and the High Court have relied upon P. W.-2 to p. W.-4 (V. Damodar Rao, K. Narayana
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top