G.S.SINGHVI, ASOK KUMAR GANGULY
Girjesh Shrivastava – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Ganguly, J. —
1. Leave is granted in all these Special Leave Petitions.
2. These appeals arise from the decision delivered on 06.08.2004 by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh in Review Petitions1071/2003, 1074/2003, and decision of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh in WP(C) 63/2002 and WP (C) 1529/2001 dated 03.11.2003. The Review Petitions were filed by those teachers who, though not impleaded in the writ petitions, were affected by High Court’s decision dated 3.11.2003.
3. Appellants are a group of Grade II and III school teachers working in Panchayat Schools as Samvida Shala Shikshak (contractual teachers). They had been appointed under the provisions of the Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Contractual Teachers (Conditions of Appointment and Service) Rules, 2001 (hereinafter “2001 Rules”). These selection rules which had come into force on 11.07.2001 were made in exercise of the powers conferred under sub- section (1) of Section 95 read with sub- section (2) of Section 70 of the Madhya Pradesh Panchayati Raj Avam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam 1993 (Act 1 of 1994).
4. Pursuant to the provisions of the said rules, an advertisement was issued by the Zila Panchayat Office, District Bhind, to
Dr. Duryodhan Sahu v. Jitendra Kumar Mishra
Union of India v. Rajesh P. U. Puthuvalnikathu
Ashok Kumar Pandey v. State of W.B.
Ramarao v. All India Backward Class Bank Employees Welfare Association
Prabodh Verma v. State of Uttar Pradesh
Dattaraj Nathuji Thaware v. State of Maharashtra
Charanjit Singh v. Harinder Sharma
B. Ramanjini v. State of Andhra Pradesh
B. Srinivasa Reddy v. Karnataka Urban Water Supply & Drainage Board Employees’ Association
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.