SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(SC) 683

B.SUDERSHAN REDDY, S.S.NIJJAR
Debashis Daw – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent


JUDGMENT

B. Sudershan Reddy, J. —

1. The appellants in these appeals and three others were tried in Sessions Trial Case No. XXVII of March 1987 by the Additional Sessions Judge, Midnapore for offences punishable under Sections 148, 324/149 and 304 part I/149 of the Indian Penal Code. The learned Additional Sessions Judge, as per his judgment dated 26th September, 1989 convicted the accused persons under Sections 148 and 304 part I read with Section 149 and as well as under Section 324/149, IPC and sentenced them to suffer rigorous imprisonment for ten years each under Section 304 part I read with Section 149, IPC only. No separate sentence has been awarded for the proven charges under Sections 148 and 324/149 of the IPC. The appellants herein preferred appeals before the High Court at Calcutta. A Division Bench of the High Court, as per its judgment dated 21st April, 2005 dismissed the appeal of the appellants.

2. Against the said judgment of the High Court, the appellants have preferred the above noted three criminal appeals.

3. Brief facts necessary for disposal of these appeals are as follows:

According to prosecution case, on 31st March, 1986, the appellants have formed themselv






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top