B.S.CHAUHAN, P.SATHASIVAM
Nirmal Jeet Singh Hoon – Appellant
Versus
Irtiza Hussain – Respondent
ORDER
Dr. B.S. Chauhan, J. —
1. Delay condoned.
2. The application for permission to appear in person and argue is allowed.
3. Facts and circumstances giving rise to the case are as follows:
(A) Irtiza Hussain, Zaheeda Khatoon and Murtuza Hussain (hereinafter referred to as ‘respondents’), were the original plaintiffs in Small Cause Case No. 41 of 1974 under Section 21 (1)(a) of the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 (hereinafter called the Act 1972). Nirmal Jeet Singh Hoon, (hereinafter referred to as ‘petitioner’), was defendant No. 3 in the above-mentioned case which was Suit for ejectment and arrears of rent filed by the respondents/plaintiffs. The case of the plaintiffs/respondents was that defendant no. 1, namely, Shri Ram Prasad (dead-nothing on record to show as to whether his legal heirs had been substituted) and defendant no. 2, namely, M/s United Hotels Pvt. Ltd., had illegally sub-let the suit property to the petitioner; and defendants had also refused to pay the amount due as rent and they should, therefore, be evicted from the suit property.
(B) Smt. Sarvari Khatoon, Plaintiff no. 4 in Small Cause Case No. 41 of 1974 died during
Ram Chandra Pandey v. Maheshwari Singh
Manzurul Haq v. Hakim Mohsin Ali
State of Rajasthan v. Harphool Singh (dead) thr. His Lrs.
Transmission Corporation of A.P. Ltd. v. P. Surya Bhagavan
Govt. of Andhra Pradesh v. Thummala Krishna Rao
State of Tamil Nadu v. Ramalinga Samigal Madam
State of Bihar v. P.P. Sharma, I.A.S.
All India State Bank Officers’ Federation v. Union of India
Dr. J.N. Banavalikar v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.