SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(SC) 1148

MARKANDEY KATJU, GYAN SUDHA MISRA
Raja Khan – Appellant
Versus
U. P. Sunni Central Waqf Board – Respondent


ORDER

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. “Something is rotten in the State of Denmark”, said Shakespeare in Hamlet, and it can similarly be said that something is rotten in the Allahabad High Court, as this case illustrates.

3. This petition has been filed against the impugned judgment passed by a division Bench of the High Court of Allahabad dated 5.8.2010 in Special Appeal No. 973 of 2010. By that judgment the ex-parte interim orders of the Single Judge of the High Court dated 11.6.2010 and 18.6.2010 passed in Writ Petition No. 34595/2010 have been set aside.

4. The brief facts of the case are that there is a Dargah known as ‘Dargah Hazrat Syed Salar Masood Ghazi R.A.’ in district Bahraich, U.P. which is managed by the Committee of Management of Waqf no.19.

5. The petitioner claims to be the proprietor of circuses e.g. Great Gemini Circus, Apollo Circus, Raj Mahal Circus and Asiad Circus, and also runs a Jhoola (cradle) for entertaining the public at large. The petitioner does touring and runs the aforesaid circuses and jhoola in ‘Melas’ and other places of public gathering.

6. In the aforesaid dargah a Mela is held in the month of Jeth, known as ‘Jeth Mela’, Bahraich















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top