SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(SC) 59

MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA, ANIL R.DAVE
Saraf Trading Corporation Etc. Etc. – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Dr. Mukundakam Sharma, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. The issue that falls for consideration in the present appeals is whether the appellant/assessee would be entitled for refund of the tax which was paid by him to the seller, in view of the provisions of Section 44 of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 (for short “the KGST Act”) . One additional issue which was urged at the time of hearing of the appeals and requires consideration by this Court is as to whether the appellant would at all be entitled to claim exemption under Section 5(3) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 (for short “the CST Act”), as at the time of sale, the appellant could not allegedly show any evidence that it was the penultimate sale.

3. The aforesaid two issues have arisen for consideration in the light of the submissions made on the basic facts of these appeals which are hereinafter being set out:-

4. The appellants are exporters of tea. The appellants purchased tea from the tea planters directly in open auction and thereafter exported the same to foreign countries. The appellant being the exporter of the aforesaid consignment claimed for exemption on the ground that purchase was exempted under Sectio










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top